JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 29, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Rodrigo Chica Quiceno Vs. Superintendencia Financiera

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Tercero Civil Del Circuito De Manizales Y El Tribunal Administrativo De Caldas. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Tercero Civil Del Circuito De Manizales
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Entidades Descentralizadas Por Servicios Del Orden Nacional
  • Conocimiento por jueces de circuito o con categoría de tales en primera instancia
Accion De Tutela Contra Superintendencia Financiera
  • Competencia del Juzgado Civil del Circuito
Superintendencia Financiera
  • Entidad descentralizada por servicios del orden nacional
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitase, por intermedio de la Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado 3deg Civil del Circuito de Manizales, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, tramite y decida la accion de tutela instaurada por Rodrigo Chica Quiceno, contra la Superintendencia Financiera.
  2. Informese esta decision al Tribunal Administrativo de Caldas.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.